Author |
Message |
ahaynes16
|
Post subject: Damage bad or good? Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 6:03 am |
|
Private |
![Private Private](./images/ranks/rank1.png) |
|
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 6:34 pm Posts: 7 Location: In youre mind Gender: male
|
Hey guys i was hearing alot about Damage units being garbage but i thought if u have armor to backem up they would do fine but i just want to hear some EXPERT opinions
_________________ Currently active in F2
Joining the Battledawn community after a long retirement
|
|
Top |
|
simmen
|
Post subject: Re: Damage bad or good? Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 6:49 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:32 am Posts: 15987 Gender: male
|
not a expert, but have played 3 years =P I don't use damage, they don't do as much damage as range before 3rd round, and don't do more damage before 4th round, but normal battles are only 1-2 rounds, so it's not worth it. thats my opinion ![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
_________________
![Image](http://i249.photobucket.com/albums/gg226/gunfire72/mentorsig.png)
Code: http://battledawn.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=111&t=4690 Thank you Michael http://www.battledawn.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=111&t=15076 Thank you developers (^-check out the topics)
|
|
Top |
|
rederoin
|
Post subject: Re: Damage bad or good? Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 6:55 am |
|
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 12:38 am Posts: 4744 Location: In your closet , the netherlands Gender: male
|
simmen wrote: not a expert, but have played 3 years =P I don't use damage, they don't do as much damage as range before 3rd round, and don't do more damage before 4th round, but normal battles are only 1-2 rounds, so it's not worth it. thats my opinion ![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif) Well, I'm a expert =P.(4 years??) And simmen is indeed correct.
_________________
![Image](http://i.imgur.com/r4AKV.gif) ![Image](http://i.imgur.com/dQ4Kk.gif) best rank/Best rank of alliance which I led 1# Most amount of crystals/relics held 355/3 Total amount of crystals/relics obtained 2500~/11
|
|
Top |
|
ahaynes16
|
Post subject: Re: Damage bad or good? Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 7:31 am |
|
Private |
![Private Private](./images/ranks/rank1.png) |
|
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 6:34 pm Posts: 7 Location: In youre mind Gender: male
|
So armor and range after the start of the round?
kool JW
Because im currently using armor and damage at the beggining of F2
_________________ Currently active in F2
Joining the Battledawn community after a long retirement
|
|
Top |
|
sabnc
|
Post subject: Re: Damage bad or good? Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2010 8:23 am |
|
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 6:22 am Posts: 145 Gender: male
|
Damage would be good at the start of a round as most people and noobs would not build range and they are fairly cheaper compared to a armor and range combination at the beginnig
|
|
Top |
|
Who4
|
Post subject: Re: Damage bad or good? Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2010 2:49 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 3:01 am Posts: 27 Gender: male
|
damage bad ![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
_________________
![Image](http://i55.tinypic.com/302asy1.jpg)
Guess Who
Member of RAWR #1 M1A3 #1 Player M1A3 Leader of AL #1 M2A6 #1 Player M2A6 Leader of AL #1 M2A7 #9 Player M2A7
Most Power:293 Most Crystals:384
|
|
Top |
|
MmCm6
|
Post subject: Re: Damage bad or good? Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2010 3:26 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 6:02 pm Posts: 1373 Location: Not at liberty to tell. Gender: male
|
Like what the others say, damage is only good up to tick 200 I guess. It gives you an edge so you could conquer and start up well. After that, it just becomes a detriment.
_________________
![Image](http://i864.photobucket.com/albums/ab207/MmCm_6/Sigs/SIG-1.png)
So yeah, I'm the guy everyone eventually hates.
[Advice for the New Player Here]
|
|
Top |
|
Polabear
|
Post subject: Re: Damage bad or good? Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2010 4:58 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 3:11 pm Posts: 803 Gender: male
|
MmCm6 wrote: Like what the others say, damage is only good up to tick 200 I guess. It gives you an edge so you could conquer and start up well. After that, it just becomes a detriment. Unless everybody builds armour the whole round, then you should be set to go ^^
|
|
Top |
|
Goldenpaw
|
Post subject: Re: Damage bad or good? Posted: Tue Nov 09, 2010 6:52 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 4:16 am Posts: 3104 Location: No.
|
i just avoid using damage damage= not good
_________________
![Image](http://i1083.photobucket.com/albums/j392/XjpegX/goldenpawsig1.png) Sig thanks to Darklighter! CoTM Winner: October
|
|
Top |
|
tellerofpointedstones
|
Post subject: Re: Damage bad or good? Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 8:51 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 9:25 pm Posts: 2445
|
use damage as spam units.best use concussive damage tanks as spam.Own the newbs who just completed tut and most prob only build up to beam inf
_________________ Socialite. Has-been.
No matter how long I have been gone, my heart will lead me back here.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
![cron](./cron.php?cron_type=tidy_cache&battlegate_prod_sid=aa2a11034a35dc27209db8a290714f6d)
|