Leaders of Battle Dawn,

The anti-sub movement is an idea that subs are a stain to battle dawn and must not be exploited to give advantage to those that are already elite.

Mega alliances that dominate world after world build sub alliances to protect their own colonies from far weaker enemies. This is done for one reason, to give said group of players the players of one alliance unfair advantage in finishing in the top 3. There is no other reason for subs other than to stroke the egos of those already elite.

You can make a difference.

If you are a leader do not lead subs. Lead your soldiers in their own unique alliance. Do not become a slave by choice.

Members you too can ask that your leaders create unique alliance names that represents your group of players. Do not support the political egos of those that abuse subs.

I am WuXing do not question my credibility. I am not an elite player. I have used tokens. I have lead subs. I have build networks of sub alliances through out all worlds. I understand the fear non elite players have for these sub abusers.

Global Alliance Ranking Leaders, I am speaking to those alliances that end in the top 3 round after round. I ask that you respect the anti-sub movements request to prohibit the use of subs.

I hope we can create a Battle Dawn anti-sub policy. Violators those clearly abusing subs will be dealt with political motivations aside.

I would love to see this working

Milanos I would like to collect ideas for a charter style document that would outline expectations.

Excellant !! HEAR HEAR !!

Earth one is a great start. At tick 109 Earth One is already full of flee alliances. Many of the top 20 alliances are subs of the top 5 alliances.

This is shamefulness join Earth 1 assist in the beginning of an anti-sub policy.

We can create 15 unique alliances that rival the top 5.

WUXING !! subs are important not many bust sometimes u need one or 2

Being in a sub for a top alliance is pretty much a fast track training course though. Don't you want the new players to learn the game from the best? The truth is, if subs did not exist, new players and their alliances would get crushed and none of them would last more than the first 3rd of the era. Then they quit.

Not to mention the fact that half of these subs are 'top players' who would otherwise not be playing that server/era, but did so to be part of a sub for his 'top player' friends. Without subs, server populations would half.


inb4 denial

ya subs are overused n abused these days.. check my thread -
http://www.battledawn.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=75&t=22453

and those 15 alliances would act together to take down the top 5 I presume?

how is that different from subs, except different name?