Play Free War Battle Games Online, Multiplayer Games, Strategy Games, Top MMORPG

zuummm · **Posted:** Sun Aug 31, 2014 6:57 pm

As a BD supporter I was slightly concerned about a message that I have received related to E3.

Can I please have some answers or explanations about this:

Quoting
"RED: BD is a scam......im about to get banned IP style....can anybody prove that ilona is NOT ROFL? these admis cheat like a muther *CENSORED* to get more money out of boosters.....basically the game died and they make deals to "liberate" xtals from those who arent in tier networks....they knew WN was coming so they changed the alliacne size...they know RIP is coming so they changed the alliance size......instead of shutting down some of the servrs and making ROFL and POB and others fight each other......they make deals to let them scam new players and bosters for wins 16:33RED: its a money scam, business is business 16:34RED: every BC in everywolrd i put it up on gets taken down ASAP.....litterally as soon as i write them, i refresh nd 2mins later, gone, hahaha.......must be half true 16:35"

Ilona · **Posted:** Mon Sep 01, 2014 2:49 am

And once again a thread like this

However, there is nothing o be concerned about.
Being an admin is a job. We have contracts and have to follow rules like everyone has when he/she get paid for doing a job.
Unfortunately, some kids don't understand it (yet) and whenever they feel unfairly treated or can't win against a strong alliance, the first thing they do is blaming the admin to be biased.

About E3, its not the first time that I change the alliance size. I do it from time to time to make it more interesting for everyone to play there.
Also a team of 10 veterans is more difficult to beat than a 3 members team, so I hope to see some new players this era at the top too

I don't know who WN is, and I also don't know if they wanted to show up or not. If they are good and think they can win it, they are more than invited to come and play. Maybe with 3 teams?

About broadcasts: Whenever a BC is x times reported by individual players, it will auto-delete. As his conspiracy theory lacks any truth, I can imagine very well that it will be always reported :lol:

felgrand08 · **Posted:** Mon Sep 01, 2014 4:35 am

Hes complaining about alliance, but let me say that i was very close to beating RoFL when the alliance size was 5.

RoFL is WEAKEST when spread out. The larger the alliance size, the harder RoFL is to beat, as it is with almost every major team.

As for "Admins being biased" i have only seen one time where an admin seemed to favor a certain alliance, and that was when one of them put garrisons in the ocean so a certain alliance could grab unreachable and undefended relics. Big mistake from the admin who got ALOT of heat.

As for E3, i have yet to see a half decent show up to face RoFL. CME tried and was carried by myself for the entire length of the war because they weren't committed. This last era none of the alliances were ready to go the length to beat RoFL. So don't go crying on the forums over and over just because you WERE NOT GOOD enough to beat an alliance of skilled and active players.

I would very much like to thank illona for giving me another chance on e3 by bringing the alliance size way down. I am a solo player and work best when alone. This era will be a great chance for me to beat RoFL and many other alliances. Thanks Illona, you continue to rock.

Alone1 · **Posted:** Mon Sep 01, 2014 4:53 am

So Seth, welcome to e3 again.

zuummm · **Posted:** Mon Sep 01, 2014 4:59 am

Just as I thought.... a load of BS...

In my opinion, being a 3 player era it actually brings some excitement to the game...

Hitmo · **Posted:** Mon Sep 01, 2014 8:22 pm

ilona i wanted to ask one thing , i'm not a supporter though (but will be soon) i'm concerned abt this game. I dont have any problems with the admins but with the management , i often listen to malicewolf and greeny legend(i think they are popular enough so that you know them) they tell me abt OC days with population around 3k players and now even 1k is not reached.
greeny made it clear that the game will not last longer seeing the current conditions and even malice says another big change is required as we had from oc to current version.
i want this game to be healthy alive for atleast next 5-6 yrs

ARF · **Posted:** Mon Sep 01, 2014 9:06 pm

Hitmo wrote:

i often listen to malicewolf and greeny legend

They are not wrong though. Thing about OC is no one played for anything. No blue tokens or medals or anything else, just the pride of winning.

Before it was about displaying skill, now it is about finding the most efficient way to get some pixelated medal

felgrand08 · **Posted:** Tue Sep 02, 2014 12:19 am

Yes, i do think that the added rewards have brought something no one was looking for. Winning has become the means, rather than the reward.

Ilona · **Posted:** Tue Sep 02, 2014 12:35 am

well, nothing against being nostalgic but thats not the real reason.
6 or 7 years ago, the situation was very different. There were only some free to play games around, flash was still new and exciting, and gaming on mobile devices wasn't even possible. At that time, Bd didn't had to spend a single buck on marketing campaigns - the players just came and played.

Nowadays, around 80% of all ppl who play games, play them on mobile devices and tablets. So there are only 20% left and a lot games compete for them.

However, even when BD becomes more and more a niche game, we are not giving up on this and there is still progress and ideas for the future 8-)

NaveedNiazi · **Joined:** Mon Feb 18, 2013 8:42 am **Posts:** 740

1> about topic of the thread

I can not blame admins... they are nice, polite and hard working...

Spoiler:

2> about game, this game isn't going to die. but its truth it is losing population... and yes we need some BIIIIIIIGGGGGGG change... which may have same basics as we have now, but with change in Graphics i.e as we seen last Christmiss...

Forum rules

Concerned about BD