I got a msg from Karl that kenny used fake msgs to him so he is attacking us.

1. I would like to see the evidence. ( cleared )

2. We were allies at the time that TLG moved against us. I cant understand since you attack an alliance cause it did something wrong and you play by honor , where is the honor to an attack that it was already planned and without a declaration of war?

3. Since your problem is our leader methods , why you are taking out everything from your allies , when we didnt ever backstabbed TLG?
Explanation : Problem for TLG seems to be leader of F , if leader of F did mistakes why you dont give time to members of F to decide for themselves what they are going to do? Honor ways are simple not complicated.

Well i open this thread for discussion , i want to listen TLG members opinion and karl's ofc.

Also its a sub story that i have to discuss first with karl and maybe isnt going to come up to this thread. Some thinks to this round of E3 and between TLG and F are still shady and not only the points that karl and his member give out to explain their attack but also from TLG to F.

So i would like to listen some official answers to 2,3 and about the other matter i prefer to discuss it privately.

I always was and i am straightforward , never betrayed anyone , never lied to anyone and i respect the ppl who lives and play the same way as i.

ps: mature answers and not flaming to my post plz.

apex? :O

yes

This was quite obviously a planned backstab - Requesting/demanding outposts in Australia, getting alliances around us to attack us when needed, allying L while offering us help to kill them in trade of the outposts mentioned before.


By all means, if Kenny did what is claimed he did he certainly was in the wrong - but there's not enough bulls in the world to provide the crap needed to cover the fact this is an excuse and not a reason.


I am disappointed in you Karl, I truly am. I warned my alliance you would most likely do such a thing - and was told that you would value your friendships over profit. Apparently they were wrong... Glad I learned your true colors before I dealt with you as a leader myself on another world.


That said I quit playing this due internal disagreements related to other things and will not partake in this war.

It's quite obvious what happened here. Even though Karl and I laughed off the fake messages, he decided to use them as credible evidence to mount a war on me while L was banned. Now he wins the era because he was able to take me out and L no longer is a threat. I still am in disbelief that people would play like this.

Backstabbing is viable on Battledawn, while it doesn't earn you any friends it certainly is a way to get rid of a strong rival.

Would be nice for Karl not to turn around and act as if this was a retaliation seeing as it was fairly obvious that he intended to be aggressive towards our alliance, rather than making it seem like a preventable incident.

So basically I don't feel aggrieved at the backstab itself, but the manner in which it has been reasoned and explained leaves me a bit saddened but oh well.

funny thing my team had a radar in auzzie and i noticed TLG building gates right there n i thought to myself.. "yep they gonna backstab F" lol

its kinda common when a top team sees another with alot of loot and not alot of army to go in for the kill so doesnt surprise me but i never respect backstabbers even if the people they backstabbed absolutely hate me.. ehermm... alexander n kenny *cough*

No, you're right. I should've seen it coming. I've seen backstabs come at me before, but I let my guard down this era. I haven't played Battle Dawn for a year, and I had one of my best friends for like 3 years now tell me that I could trust Karl and his team. I forgot how brutal this game can get and ignored other people telling me to distrust Karl and start making a move on them.

Battle Dawn, she's a cruel lass.

Technically You can't say every move against another is a backstab. Now I'm not trying to say what is going on right now isn't backstab but, i would like to know:

Nap- when did you establish it and how long was it?
Conditions- What were the conditions you both agreed on?

Another thing, Did you just say you were allies? Cause if it is just by words it isn't a very strong relationship to begin with..In my eyes No NAP no Backstab. No terms and conditions, No backstab. Certain things you have to look at.