Author |
Message |
mrducky
|
Post subject: Re: Socialism is a failure Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 11:51 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:06 pm Posts: 781 Gender: male
|
Plotter wrote: [ *worships Odi*1. Unions = Socialist Enyways, yes I see, there's always a bit of capitalism in outsourcing, and with Unions, they're not bad, just the union bosses are absolutely commie.2. Am I serious? This is my point? A new low for me, zOMG! Keke, yer silly, lemme see the website or wiki thst has the instructions to make B-2 and Nukes OMg, they can even make top secret US army material!3. But we can give Zimbabwe our debt! ^_^ And with piiratés in Somaaalliiia they = Anarchy.mrducky wrote: i win cause im imbued with odiism.
therefore SMEH! I win because I'm Canadian!4 mrducky wrote: sigh* i said i wouldnt post here but i did Y-Y you guys are monsters. each and everyone of you. even you MISTER DUCKAII! Haha, you posted, *taunts ducky*1. of course the union bosses seem commy, thats their entire point of being 2. im assuming sarcasm doesnt go over the internet well... im just saying that any outsourcing is usually products that have little value and can be mass manufactured cheaply. the whole point of bringing up B2 stealth bombers or nukes is that USA doesnt outsource anything that is important, just the cheaper labor as capitalism is about hte bottom line. and generally giving the blueprints to a stealth bomber will cost the country a tonne more in the long run... 3. Somalia is true capitalism. it has 0 regulations and it has no governmental control (aka. socialism) you can go along a street and there will be 70 fruit vendors trying to sell their fruit for marginal profits. then you have the massive telecommunications company that is worth millions but has no competitors because they can muscle away competition by dropping rates for a while and take the losses while their competitors go bankrupt. zimbabwe has its own problems :3 and canadians club harp seals they are so fluffeh! so you lose. 4. and AND. i posted again, so i lose ..... as for icesoda.... when is the next election?
_________________
-~~Retired Spammer~~-
~Agnostic atheist pastafarian~
Discussion+debates and World Events.
|
|
Top |
|
IceSodaaaa
|
Post subject: Re: Socialism is a failure Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 6:09 am |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 1:49 pm Posts: 10
|
They won't give us one, haha.
The whole country has been asking for one since 2007 but they are leaving it to the last minute allowed which is May/April 2010.
|
|
Top |
|
Plotter
|
Post subject: Re: Socialism is a failure Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 9:04 am |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 9:04 am Posts: 542 Location: Canuckistan Gender: female
|
IceSodaaaa wrote: They won't give us one, haha.
The whole country has been asking for one since 2007 but they are leaving it to the last minute allowed which is May/April 2010. That is one form of socialism where the leader wants to stay in power.
LET the people decide when we have an election, not a freaking budget.
_________________ Worlds I play(ed) in: E5A4 - COLD E5A8 - >GP<
E3A1 - MES
My ISP sucks
|
|
Top |
|
Alexander
|
Post subject: Re: Socialism is a failure Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 4:18 am |
|
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 6:41 am Posts: 4629 Location: The Netherlands Gender: male
|
I disagree, you voted them into the government. The deal is that every government get's a certain time period to influence the current laws, and implement their plans into the country. If you take away time from that, you get something only half-finished.
Ruling a country is like baking a cake: you'll want them to finish it.
_________________ Best Regards,
Alexander Product Manager Battle Dawn
Skype: dreamerofdestruction
|
|
Top |
|
mrducky
|
Post subject: Re: Socialism is a failure Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 5:18 am |
|
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:06 pm Posts: 781 Gender: male
|
Plotter wrote: IceSodaaaa wrote: They won't give us one, haha.
The whole country has been asking for one since 2007 but they are leaving it to the last minute allowed which is May/April 2010. That is one form of socialism where the leader wants to stay in power.
LET the people decide when we have an election, not a freaking budget."That is one form of socialism where the leader wants to stay in power." tell me any form of government where the leaders do not want to stay in power? stop scape goating nothing >.> besides Jasper is right. the only thing that can retake office is if Obama bungles BAD and has to stand down or be forcefully veto-ed. funnily enough in the history of Presidents, its mainly the republicans that get threatened with and actually get kicked out of presidency/stand down... hmmmm they made 1 term as 4 years. less QQ more PEW PEW
_________________
-~~Retired Spammer~~-
~Agnostic atheist pastafarian~
Discussion+debates and World Events.
|
|
Top |
|
patzz
|
Post subject: Re: Socialism is a failure Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 5:31 pm |
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 8:55 pm Posts: 176 Location: Watching You. Gender: male
|
Plotter wrote: IceSodaaaa wrote: They won't give us one, haha.
The whole country has been asking for one since 2007 but they are leaving it to the last minute allowed which is May/April 2010. That is one form of socialism where the leader wants to stay in power.
LET the people decide when we have an election, not a freaking budget.LMAO. This has been there since USA started. The people never had a say in it, they made the government so only wealthy people would have a say in it. Look at the drawing of the meetings, what do you see? I see men with power, i don't see farmers in any of the constitutional meetings. Some of them were stupid yet because they had money they were included. And quoting my blah blah comment only means what i said before was better than what you said then, i actually love when you put it at the end of your post, it was like a killing statement. Every Election what happens? there's millions of votes yet only about 500 are counted right? Representatives is what we call them but it proves they don't care what the people say.
_________________ -rotag
white lady says:Obama said "I'm going to turn this country into a Marxism country". Its a reliable source, some guy with a pointy white mask gave it to me.
|
|
Top |
|
Plotter
|
Post subject: Re: Socialism is a failure Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:29 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 9:04 am Posts: 542 Location: Canuckistan Gender: female
|
patzz wrote: LMAO. PMSLpatzz wrote: This has been there since USA started. The people never had a say in it, they made the government so only wealthy people would have a say in it. Maybe in America, but I live in a country where only those who live in the Eastern part of the country get a say in government, while in the West (where I live), we get told to "F*** Off, you don't get a say in the government!" or "We don't care about your concerns.". It don't matter if you're a multi-millionare or a slum dweller, City Slicker or Rural Hick, you get the door slammed in your face. (At least it's not as bad as before, because our PM comes from Cowtown.)patzz wrote: Look at the drawing of the meetings, what do you see? I see men with power, i don't see farmers in any of the constitutional meetings. Some of them were stupid yet because they had money they were included. In my picture, I see Cosmo Elites from the Toronto lakefront, Separatists, and Whiners that voted Liberal.patzz wrote: And quoting my blah blah comment only means what i said before was better than what you said then, i actually love when you put it at the end of your post, it was like a killing statement. Are you referring to the post where I kicked your rear end hard and said I won because I'm an ignorant moron? If it is, it was purely sarcasm because that comment from you shows that Socialists name call when they get wtfpwned by Conservatives or Libertarians.patzz wrote: Every Election what happens? there's millions of votes yet only about 500 are counted right? And the 500 that are counted are usually Democrat, Labour, Liberal, or whatever lefty ideology/name you like to call it.patzz wrote: Representatives is what we call them but it proves they don't care what the people say. Maybe in America, but representatives are the jewel in Canada, well, in Eastern Canada, that is.
_________________ Worlds I play(ed) in: E5A4 - COLD E5A8 - >GP<
E3A1 - MES
My ISP sucks
|
|
Top |
|
Alexander
|
Post subject: Re: Socialism is a failure Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:08 am |
|
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 6:41 am Posts: 4629 Location: The Netherlands Gender: male
|
Stupid district systems and all.
In holland, we just count all votes, and give out seats in the parlement based upon the amount of votes recieved. No limit on the participant either, no democrats or republicans.
We 0wn xD
_________________ Best Regards,
Alexander Product Manager Battle Dawn
Skype: dreamerofdestruction
|
|
Top |
|
mrducky
|
Post subject: Re: Socialism is a failure Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:44 am |
|
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:06 pm Posts: 781 Gender: male
|
Jasper Alexander wrote: Stupid district systems and all.
In holland, we just count all votes, and give out seats in the parlement based upon the amount of votes recieved. No limit on the participant either, no democrats or republicans.
We 0wn xD exactly, popular vote=democracy. USA needs to update their voting system esp after bush took office over Gore despite having less votes counted for him overall wait. WAIT. WAIT!. plotter... did this just smack you in the face? where democrat votes were discarded over republican? please stop generalising to constantly demonize socialism.
_________________
-~~Retired Spammer~~-
~Agnostic atheist pastafarian~
Discussion+debates and World Events.
|
|
Top |
|
Plotter
|
Post subject: Re: Socialism is a failure Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 10:23 am |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 9:04 am Posts: 542 Location: Canuckistan Gender: female
|
mrducky wrote: exactly, popular vote=democracy. Exactly, wait, wait, did me and ducky agree on something?mrducky wrote: USA needs to update their voting system esp after bush took office over Gore despite having less votes counted for him overall wait. Which is fine, because there would be at least 1000 terrorist attacks in America, but then again, Bush is a warlock, so both Hypocrite Gore and Warlock Bush are horrible picks.mrducky wrote: WAIT. WAIT!. plotter... did this just smack you in the face? where democrat votes were discarded over republican?
Nope, it was FLORIDA! Bad Bad bad FLORIDA! Oh, and here's a gift from the palm *SMACK*mrducky wrote: please stop generalising to constantly demonize socialism. Hypocracy alert.
_________________ Worlds I play(ed) in: E5A4 - COLD E5A8 - >GP<
E3A1 - MES
My ISP sucks
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|