thats the reply u will get when u tell an admin y there isnt a non boosting era


the truth- all admins know that if bd becomes a pay only game, it would lose 70% of its population and would go in loss

the suggestion- make a championship era non boosting

the problems- yeah yeah i hav heard them many times that many people would not boost anymore due 2 various reasons which we hav disscused be4

the challenge- ok u make a boost free champ era, as it ends u make the game
paid(one needs 2 pay certain amt of money in order 2 play battledawn), im sure noone has the guts 2 make this game paid cauz it will go in loss if done
WHY?
70% of population on bd are non supporters
bd loses 8000 people, bankkrupt

admins challenge- u dont take your salary for 1 month, or use teh profit u guys gained from CE, 2 make a non boosting era and run it (YOU GUYS SHOW YOUR LOVE FOR BD)

comments on current *championship era*- guy who brought over 200,000 reds wins the era along with his alliance, was it an auction? or championship era? or a cunning plan of bd?

- 75 mass boosts? 100 boosts in 1 mass- 150 reds per boost (average)= 150*100*75= 1125000 reds boosted or 22,500$ spent


so lets c the future of bd

anyways, i hav quit bd, and as said in my earlier post this was my last post in bd forum, ill only reply on this post on ur comments

.... Was this just a whine rant I'm not seeing the point..

First off you do not know how the mass boost is calculated so your math there is already nullified. Secondly considering the amount of hours all the admins put into this game they make hardly anything yet you want them to give that up? Third the admins have already proposed a way for us to have a non boosting era, a pay to place world. Asking the admins to give up what they earn as if they do not already do enough for this game is just selfish and possibly childish.
As for your comments about the current champions era, the enemies of VND boosted just as much as VND did the difference was they did not play the game intelligently (Sage sitting and boosting rather than expanding for one example). The boosting of VND leveled the playing field with the other boosting alliances and allowed their skill to truly shine through which by the utter domination of the world it clearly did.

it's not just about the money

it's about the player mindset

"hey there is a non-boosting world, where u can win without the need to spend any money. Why should we spend our money here?"

and as a result, booster number decreased = bad

nope, nope and nope. Watever u say, a non-boosting world is completely impossible and will never be implemented

Pretty much everything Korupt said.

I would play a Pay-to-Place nonboosting round, but not many would.

Stop being so naïve people, Servers cost money, Workers cost money, URL's cost money, Forums Cost money. On top of all that, the creators of BD are not making ANY profit. In fact, if I recall correctly, they have dipped DEEP into their own pockets so that you can play this game.

Ungrateful is the only way I can describe the whining about boosting.

-Pete

he said non boosting ERA not non boosting WORLD. you tell me how just one era would send BD to rock bottom financially.

note: i have no intention to play any eras, i just want to know.

It wouldn't help which is enough of a reason not to do it..

blue tokens don't really help since only a fraction of people actually vote, and even fewer do the other things. let's get rid of blues.

Make voting give more tokens but somehow only give tokens to people who actually vote for the game (instead of just clicking the link).

^ if only that were possible.