I just wanted to know if what would happen if I sent an attack that would definitly conquer the player but the player sent an attack that would definitIly conquer me and they both had the same eta.

If you have more troops or better ratio and you're unconquered you will conquer the player you're attacking if he is not conquered of course and vice versa.
If you'd like someone to help you play and understand the game more you can fill an application in the AANC thread, it will help you pass the learning curve more easily.

k thx

You're welcome.

not true, if both of you send the attacks at the same ETA, the attack that has less rounds will "win". Which means if my attack doesn't go through any defense, but his attack took 2 rounds to finish, which means my attack "won" and I conquered him.

In case both attacks have the same amount of round, it will be a battle of luck

I actually almost want to say this is wrong, less rounds would mean you conquer him first but then the battle with more rounds technically happens after meaning it might free him and conquer you. Unless it is coded different for this scenario. I know when you attack someone and also attack their conquers to land same tick if your attack on him is 2 rounds and the attack on his conquers is one round you will not conquer them since they were still conquered.

ok thx again

so whos right aister or KD

now i dont know whos right

I would say I am right since my theory is based on other things that occur in the game.