Ferr3t wrote:
I see two things that are a little odd with your post..
1. "Attack us?" Kane, about 150 ticks ago we defended our territory by attacking one tiny OP that you placed within 15 ticks of our hive. (No troops were lost) What did you expect us to do? Roll over and allow you to dominate?
150 ticks ago? That was tick 43, don't exaggerate. It was not long ago. We expanded peacefully and didn't touch anything of yours. You put yourself in the center of the map, so expecting 15 ticks of exclusion is ridiculous. An absence of attacking is not rolling over, it's simply sharing.
We share Africa with R, I see no reason why SNN thinks they can be more selfish. You bit off more than you can chew, that is your fault. If you thought it through better you would not attack and antagonize an alliance you couldn't stand against comfortably in war if your aggression were met with aggression like we are seeing now.
Ferr3t wrote:
2. Less insulting than our last offer? If anything, you were insulting with your request of no boundaries (allowing you to walk right up to our hive) while we were being perfectly reasonable, allowing you the WHOLE western hemisphere to expand to.
Really, you could have had your east secure while you dominated the west.. Why I wonder? Who knows.. Maybe you consider us a threat now that PHE are no longer useless?
I'll create a new topic for the war now.
You offered a 1000 tick NAP to keep us out of Asia, that is insulting because I told you a split between Africa/Asia was not something I could agree too but you simply offered it again. If you wanted us out of Asia you should have offered us something we wanted, not reoffered something we already declined.
I don't consider SNN a threat, but I will not be told where I can't expand to. I am the type who prefers sharing territory than splitting it. If you want to keep us out, you have to fight us, which you did. That attack is now being met with our response. I hope it was worth it.
