WarrMachine wrote:
EnSabahNur wrote:
I've had games against players that complained about the use of kits. I'm just wondering why.
Kits are a part of the game and add a level of strategy. Just like you strategically choose which order to place your mechs in, you also choose which combination of kits to use to supplement your builds.
Are kits frowned upon because some people can't afford them? It just seems odd. Why wouldn't you use a tactic that's built into the game? It seems as silly as complaining about drone use.
People hate kits because they do the complete opposite of what you're saying.
Basically every match is a gamble of whether or not you brought a resistance kit that matches the type of mech your opponent has. This isn't strategical at all.
The existence of kits essentially makes every match for a top player a living nightmare. Did I bring the right kits? Did they bring the right kits? Essentially, no one really likes kits. The game would be much better without them.
I'm a top player. I don't think it's a living nightmare. I like kits.
Kit use involves just as much strategy as hoping your line-up order matches up favorably with their line-up order. It is just as much of a variable as which upgrade pads are on the ground. This game would get extremely boring if there were no variables. It would just be a gear check. Every match is a bit of a gamble, and it should be.
I would also say that I don't think top players need to be catered to. If kits help a 2nd tier player beat a top tier player once in a while, I'm all for it.