Play Free War Battle Games Online, Multiplayer Games, Strategy Games, Top MMORPG

ancky3 · **Joined:** Mon Apr 01, 2013 8:39 am **Posts:** 30

lordjarzami wrote:

understand this everyone. SWAT takes every action involving us seriously. is it possible the "proof" was "doctored" as u put it? yes. but we would rather risk taking first action than to sit back and wait on an attack on us. plz dont make the mistake of thinking we will sit back and watch as we are turned on and killed. the only mistake ive seen we make so far is the attack on HeHo as they themselves were not in the chat...which is the reason for the ceasefire i myself just put in effect.

good logic i agree with u

slayerofall wrote:

lordjarzami wrote:

understand this everyone. SWAT takes every action involving us seriously. is it possible the "proof" was "doctored" as u put it? yes. but we would rather risk taking first action than to sit back and wait on an attack on us. .

That would be being a Paranoid as you would play in the hands of anyone who brings you any info.. True or false..!! Where is the process of verifying the authenticity?

that's called pre - emptive strike just like what US applies in the war with iRAq and afghan ahaha....even if you remove the ketan part the convo is still about whether to attack swat or not which means they are in the initial stage of planning it

Clamination · **Posted:** Sun Oct 27, 2013 11:00 pm

ancky3 wrote:

that's called pre - emptive strike just like what US applies in the war with iRAq and afghan ahaha....even if you remove the ketan part the convo is still about whether to attack swat or not which means they are in the initial stage of planning it

OR they could've argued for a peaceful solution. All this is based on the assumption that SPF was going to auto-war SWAT. Btw, its funny how a pinoy instigator would come here. Very interesting.

slayerofall · **Joined:** Thu Sep 01, 2011 2:45 pm **Posts:** 306

ancky3 wrote:

slayerofall wrote:

lordjarzami wrote:

understand this everyone. SWAT takes every action involving us seriously. is it possible the "proof" was "doctored" as u put it? yes. but we would rather risk taking first action than to sit back and wait on an attack on us. .

That would be being a Paranoid as you would play in the hands of anyone who brings you any info.. True or false..!! Where is the process of verifying the authenticity?

that's called pre - emptive strike just like what US applies in the war with iRAq and afghan ahaha....even if you remove the ketan part the convo is still about whether to attack swat or not which means they are in the initial stage of planning it

My question would be...!!

1- Who brought this info?? If you have the info u definitely know the source of it, is not it?? I am sure the ppl who are "supposedly" chatting in that convo have not provided it themselves.. So, there is someone in that chatroom who has has provided it. If yes, who is that person? And why cant that person provide the screenshots too.? Can be a case of some kicked out person from SPF, copying some old convo.. changing texts and maybe time-
stamps and passing it on to take revenge on old teammates LOL..!!

2- Why should the ketan part be removed?? If the info is authentic and not tampered then there should not be any lose ends..!!

ancky3 · **Joined:** Mon Apr 01, 2013 8:39 am **Posts:** 30

Clamination wrote:

ancky3 wrote:

that's called pre - emptive strike just like what US applies in the war with iRAq and afghan ahaha....even if you remove the ketan part the convo is still about whether to attack swat or not which means they are in the initial stage of planning it

OR they could've argued for a peaceful solution. All this is based on the assumption that SPF was going to auto-war SWAT. Btw, its funny how a pinoy instigator would come here. Very interesting.

much funnier is that SPF have a pinoy as their members including their subs too and sorry but i did not know we are not allowed to comment here sorry my bad

@everyone

can someone point me in the right direction where pinoy's can post? thanks

slayerofall · **Joined:** Thu Sep 01, 2011 2:45 pm **Posts:** 306

ancky3 wrote:

Clamination wrote:

ancky3 wrote:

that's called pre - emptive strike just like what US applies in the war with iRAq and afghan ahaha....even if you remove the ketan part the convo is still about whether to attack swat or not which means they are in the initial stage of planning it

OR they could've argued for a peaceful solution. All this is based on the assumption that SPF was going to auto-war SWAT. Btw, its funny how a pinoy instigator would come here. Very interesting.

much funnier is that SPF have a pinoy as their members including their subs too and sorry but i did not know we are not allowed to comment here sorry my bad

@everyone

can someone point me in the right direction where pinoy's can post? thanks

That would probably need a separate section called most banned players .. ROFL..!! :lol:

Mike · **Posted:** Sun Oct 27, 2013 11:08 pm

ancky3 wrote:

lordjarzami wrote:

understand this everyone. SWAT takes every action involving us seriously. is it possible the "proof" was "doctored" as u put it? yes. but we would rather risk taking first action than to sit back and wait on an attack on us. plz dont make the mistake of thinking we will sit back and watch as we are turned on and killed. the only mistake ive seen we make so far is the attack on HeHo as they themselves were not in the chat...which is the reason for the ceasefire i myself just put in effect.

good logic i agree with u

slayerofall wrote:

lordjarzami wrote:

understand this everyone. SWAT takes every action involving us seriously. is it possible the "proof" was "doctored" as u put it? yes. but we would rather risk taking first action than to sit back and wait on an attack on us. .

That would be being a Paranoid as you would play in the hands of anyone who brings you any info.. True or false..!! Where is the process of verifying the authenticity?

that's called pre - emptive strike just like what US applies in the war with iRAq and afghan ahaha....even if you remove the ketan part the convo is still about whether to attack swat or not which means they are in the initial stage of planning it

Merged your posts, in the future simply edit your previous post to include what you wish to say rather than double posting.

ancky3 · **Joined:** Mon Apr 01, 2013 8:39 am **Posts:** 30

@slayerofall

hmmm it is best you contact your SPF friends and let them post their "TRUE" convo.....if they can ehehe till then no point in asking SWAT for a screenshot from their source because it should be SPF posting a screenshot to debunked all this

and where is that MOST BANNED sumthing thread? thanks

@admin
sorry my mistake

slayerofall · **Joined:** Thu Sep 01, 2011 2:45 pm **Posts:** 306

ancky3 wrote:

@slayerofall

hmmm it is best you contact your SPF friends and let them post their "TRUE" convo.....if they can ehehe till then no point in asking SWAT for a screenshot from their source because it should be SPF posting a screenshot to debunked all this

i thought it's always the witness who is supposed to be providing the evidence to the crime... first time in my live heard that i should be going to the Suspect to go back to the crime scene and pull it out...!! :mrgreen:

ancky3 · **Joined:** Mon Apr 01, 2013 8:39 am **Posts:** 30

slayerofall wrote:

i thought it's always the witness who is supposed to be providing the evidence to the crime... first time in my heard that i should be going to the Suspect to go back to the crime scene and pull it out...!! :mrgreen:

lols dont you know anything bro? try watching court movies or series try SUITS and you should learn a thing or two about what im saying.

but for the meantime let me try to educate you a little. in court witness (prosecution) will present an evidence and the suspect (defense) will present their evidence to refute the evidence presented if all evidence are to be presented only by the witness then i bet all suspect would lose the battle.

simple logic really ^_^ :mrgreen:

Mike · **Posted:** Sun Oct 27, 2013 11:23 pm

ancky3 wrote:

@admin
sorry my mistake

Not an admin haha just want to clear that up before some rumor starts or something. :lol:

why SWAT attacked SPF and HeHo